AI-generated slurs have appeared everywhere, including in peer-reviewed literature. Fake quotes, unedited quick responses, and redundant sketches have all gotten past editors and peer reviewers, and it’s not always clear whether there will be any consequences for those responsible.
Now, it appears that many scientific fields will enact rules against AI-generated problems even before peer review or journals are involved. One of those involved in the physics and astronomy preprint server arXiv used a social media thread to announce that any inappropriate AI-generated content submitted to the server would result in a one-year ban and a permanent requirement that future publications undergo peer review before being hosted by arXiv.
Thomas Dieterich, in addition to being an emeritus professor at Oregon State University, is heavily involved with arXiv, serving on its Editorial Advisory Council and its moderation team. He is therefore well placed to understand the organization’s policies, although we have also contacted arXiv leadership for confirmation, but have not yet received a response.
In a thread on Those standards state, “Submissions to arXiv should follow appropriate standards of scholarly communication, including appropriately and carefully prepared sections, figures, tables, references, etc.” “General honesty and preparation require care.”
<a href