In the days since the shootings at this year’s White House correspondents’ dinner were cut short, there has been a surge in conspiracy theory videos made by people who insist that the entire situation was a false flag operation. These types of theories are nothing new, but the way they are now spreading is a reflection of how reaction video culture is reshaping our social media landscape. And even though the initial chaos surrounding the shooting has started to subside, content creators are still posting about what “really” happened.
There’s still a lot we don’t know about the 31-year-old suspected shooter, Cole Allen, who reportedly traveled from Los Angeles to Washington, D.C., before WCHD and was staying at the same Hilton where the event was held. But that hasn’t stopped content creators on platforms like YouTube, TikTok, Instagram and
None of these videos reveal anything that hasn’t already been reported through traditional media outlets. But each of them speaks to the way this brand of content has become a normal part of people’s media consumption habits and something that creators see as a viable way to garner attention. In the US, trust in traditional media outlets is historically low and more people are turning to social media to stay informed about world events. And that change has given conspiracy-mongering content creators a prime opportunity to influence the way people perceive reality.
This is all similar to what happened in 2024 when Donald Trump survived an assassination attempt while campaigning for the presidency. Then, creators rushed to capitalize on the incident, writing it off as a false flag designed to gain sympathy for the Republican candidate. That news cycle and the discourse that followed lasted for several weeks, both because it was a key moment in an election year and because it was difficult to understand how Trump could have been shot in the ear without any visible damage afterward.
Several new videos about the WHCD shooting suggest that we should view these events as a response to the Trump administration’s propensity to spread misinformation. And while there is no evidence to suggest that the WHCD shooting was, in fact, conducted with Trump’s approval, one could argue that the administration is at least partially responsible for the way this idea has gained popularity on the Internet.
As easy as it is to laugh at the constant nonsense posts coming from the president’s social media accounts and other official government channels, they have undoubtedly impacted the way the public thinks about the current administration. By sharing ugly, immature memes and AI-generated images of Trump as a Christ-like figure, the White House has told people that nothing should be taken seriously and everything can be turned into a sick joke. And at a time when all of the Internet’s biggest social media platforms have begun encouraging their users to upload videos of themselves in pursuit of engagement, it makes sense that many would see this past weekend’s shooting as an opportunity to boost their profiles.
Trump has made nonsensical “jokes” a key part of his political brand, and people are responding with much the same energy.
<a href