I was re-watching The Silence of the Lambs last night, and something hit me hard. This 1991 film feels livelier, more entertaining, more Real Compared to most things coming out today. And it got me thinking: Why do movies from the 80s and 90s look so much better than what we get now?
There’s something about the way old movies were made that modern cinema seems to be losing. Take Goodfellas from 1990. Scorsese doesn’t just tell you a story about mobsters, he draws you into their world. Shot through the tracking Copacabana, the narration feels like a conversation, the way the violence erupts suddenly and brutally. You feel the allure of that lifestyle and the paranoia that comes with it. Every frame has a purpose. Every scene builds character. Compare this to 2019’s The Irishman, which is really good but feels bloated, is too long, relies too much on “de-aging” techniques that never convince you.
Or think about 1994’s Pulp Fiction. Tarantino took the narrative structure and broke it to pieces, then turned it into something that shouldn’t work, but works brilliantly. Communication breaks out. The characters feel alive. Vincent and Jules aren’t just hitmen, they’re like philosophers debating foot massages and divine intervention between murders. Now look at something like the Bullet Train of 2022. It’s definitely stylish, but it feels like too much effort is being put into making it unique. The characters are ideal. The dialogue is clever for the sake of cleverness. It’s entertaining in the moment but disappears from your memory almost immediately.
Even The Silence of the Lambs proves this. Each conversation between Clarice and Hannibal is like a chess match. You feel his vulnerability, his intelligence, the way he gets under his skin. The horror isn’t in the jump scares, it’s in the psychological warfare. Modern thrillers like 2021’s The Woman in the Window have twists and atmosphere, but they lack the deep character work that makes you really care about what happens.
I guess the difference boils down to this: older movies took risks. He trusted the audience to pay attention, to feel something, to think. Scorsese and Tarantino had dreams and the freedom to execute them without endless studio interference. They weren’t chasing demographics or worrying about franchise potential. they were making moviesNo product.
Today’s cinema often seems designed by committee, optimized for streaming algorithms and opening weekend numbers rather than lasting impact. We have better technology, bigger budgets, more sophisticated effects, but somewhere, we forgot that movies are supposed to move us, not just waste our time between scrolling sessions.
Maybe I’m just nostalgic. Maybe I’m romanticizing the past. But when I finish a good movie, I think about it for hours, even days, depending on the movie. When I finish most modern blockbuster movies, I’m already thinking about dinner. And that difference, I think, says everything.
<a href