250px SlashdotEffectGraph.svg

Slashdot effect – Wikipedia

by

Increase in traffic due to link

“Flash crowd” redirects here. For the short story by Larry Niven, see Flash Crowd. Check out flash mobs for real-world social interaction.

slashdot effectalso known as slashdotting Or cuddle death This happens when a popular website links to a smaller website, causing a huge increase in traffic. This overloads the small site, causing it to slow down or become temporarily unavailable. Typically, less robust sites are unable to cope with huge increases in traffic and become unavailable – common reasons are lack of sufficient data bandwidth, servers that fail to cope with large numbers of requests, and traffic quotas. Sites built on shared hosting services often fail when they encounter the slashdot effect. This has the same effect as a denial of service attack, even if it is accidental. The name originated from the huge flow of web traffic that would be generated from a technology news site. to slashdot Linking to websites. Word flash mob is a more common term.[1]

The original circumstances have changed, as the sudden rush of to slashdot It was reported in 2005 to be in decline due to competition from similar sites,[2] and general adoption of elastically scalable cloud hosting platforms.

The term “Slashdot effect” refers to the phenomenon of a website becoming almost inaccessible because too many people are paying attention to it after the site is mentioned in an interesting article on the popular Slashdot news service. It was later expanded to describe an effect similar to being listed on a popular site.[3]

This effect is linked to other websites or metablogs such as Fark, Digg, etc. intoxication reportImgur, Reddit, and Twitter, leading to terms like forked Or work hardbe under reddit effector get one cuddle death From the site in question.[4][5] Another common term, “flash crowd,”[6] It originates from Larry Niven’s 1973 novel of the same name, in which the invention of cheap teleportation allows crowds to gather almost instantly at sites of interesting news stories.

sites like to slashdotDigg, Reddit, Stumbleupon, and Fark feature short submission stories and a self-moderated discussion on each story. Featured presentation presents a news item or website of interest by linking to it. In response, large numbers of readers rush to visit the referenced sites simultaneously. The incoming flood of page requests from readers may exceed the site’s available bandwidth or its servers’ ability to respond, and may render the site temporarily inaccessible.

Google Doodles, which link search results to the doodle topic, result in a high increase in traffic from the search results page.[7]

250px SlashdotEffectGraph.svg
MRTG graph from a web server statistics generator showing a mean to slashdot Impact in action in 2005

Major news sites or corporate websites are typically engineered to serve large numbers of requests and therefore do not typically exhibit this effect. Websites that become victims may be hosted on home servers, serve large images or movie files or ineffectively generate dynamic content (e.g. multiple database hits for each web hit, even if all web hits are requesting the same page). These websites often become unavailable within minutes of a story appearing, even before any comments are posted. Sometimes, to pay to slashdot Subscribers (who have access to stories before non-paying users) render a site unavailable to general readers even before a story is posted.

There exist certain numbers with respect to the exact magnitude of to slashdot impact, but estimates are that the peak of the mass flow of page requests ranges from several hundred to several thousand hits per minute.[8][9][10] Flooding generally peaked when the article was at the top of the site’s home page and gradually decreased as the story was superseded by newer items. Traffic generally remained at high levels until the article was removed from the front page, which could take up to 12 to 18 hours after its initial posting. However, some articles had significantly longer lifespans due to popularity, newsworthiness, or interest in the linked article.

By 2005, journalists were commenting that to slashdot The effect was decreasing.[2] However, this effect has been observed on Twitter when certain popular users mention a website.[11]

When the target website has a community-based structure, the term can also refer to the secondary effect of a large group of new users suddenly setting up accounts and beginning to participate in the community. While in some cases this has been considered a good thing, in others it is viewed with disdain by former members, as the influx of new people often brings out too many undesirable aspects. to slashdot Also, such as trolling, vandalism and newbie behavior. It bears some resemblance to the 1990s Usenet concept of Eternal September.

Help and Prevention

[edit]

Several solutions have been proposed for sites to deal with the slashdot effect.[12]

There are several systems that automatically mirror any Slashdot-linked page to ensure that the content remains available even if the original site becomes unresponsive.[13] Sites in the process of being slashdotted may be able to minimize the impact by temporarily redirecting requests to targeted pages to one of these mirrors. Slashdot does not mirror the sites it links to on its own servers, nor does it endorse any third-party solutions. Mirroring content may be a copyright violation and, in many cases, result in loss of advertising revenue for the targeted site.

  1. , Ari, Ismail; Hong, Bo; Miller, Ethan L.; Brandt, Scott A.; Long, Darrell DE (October 2003). “Managing Internet Surge” (PDF)University of California Santa Cruz Storage Systems Research Center, Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 may 2013recovered March 15th 2010,
  2. , A b Kharif, Olga (March 2, 2005). Less impact than the “slashdot effect”. bloomberg business weekArchived from the original on 15 May 2005,
  3. , Eric S. Raymond. “Slashdot Effect”. The Jargon File, version 4.4.8recovered 21 may 2012,
  4. , Wilhelm, Alex (17 January 2012). “How Reddit turned a congressional candidate’s campaign upside down”. next webrecovered 24 October 2012,
  5. , “The Reddit Effect”. ABC News. 31 August 2012. Archived from the original on 1 November 2014recovered 24 October 2012,
  6. , Eric S. Raymond. “Flash Mob”. Jargon File (version 4.4.7)recovered 25 may 2012,
  7. , Williams, David E. “Google’s unknown artist has huge following.” CNN. 19 July 2006. Retrieved on 19 July 2006.
  8. , Stephen Adler. “The Slashdot Effect: An Analysis of Three Internet Publications”. Archived from the original on 2 December 2008recovered 19 April 2003, (mirror)
  9. , “Slashdotting graphs”. Princeton University Department of Astrophysics. Archived from the original on 27 February 2009recovered 13 January 2004,
  10. , Aaron Benoy. “Ruins in ASCII”recovered 27 September 2004,
  11. , Paul Douglas, How Stephen Fry destroyed entire websites with a single tweet, Tech Radar, 3 March 2010
  12. , Jeremy Elson; John Howell (2008), Dealing with sudden surges in your garage (PDF)Microsoft Research
  13. , Daniel Terdiman (1 October 2004). “The solution for the slashdot effect?” wiredrecovered 2016-04-18,




<a href

Leave a Comment