At a news briefing Friday, NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman described a sweeping change Moon to Mars program. These changes canceled the Artemis III lunar landing and instead made it a practice flight for the crew in low-Earth orbit. spacex Or blue origin-Built lunar lander – or, perhaps, both.
Those efforts will also affect America space The agency’s timeline for future Artemis missions is pushing the modified Artemis III flight to mid-2027, making way for Artemis IV and Artemis V in the early and late 2028s. Under the new direction, Artemis IV will be the first mission to place astronaut boots on the lunar surface.
The sweeping revisions to the agency’s schedule came during an update on repairs. space launch system rocket, which will launch Artemis IIIn early April, a 10-day crewed lunar flyby mission.
“There has to be a better way that is consistent with our history,” Isaacman said. “We didn’t jump straight to Apollo 11. We did it through Mercury, Gemini, and several Apollo missions, with a launch cadence of every three months. We shouldn’t get comfortable with the current cadence. We should go back to the basics and do what we know works.”
These ‘avatars’ will fly around the moon with NASA’s Artemis 2 astronauts
NASA leaders said the shuffle is aimed at addressing a larger underlying problem: The U.S. agency is flying its most powerful rockets too rarely and repeating some of the same technical issues from one mission to the next.
Isaacman pointed to hydrogen leaks on Artemis I and helium flow problems on Artemis II as indications that a three-year gap between launches is not sustainable. When teams fly every few years, he said, they lose “muscle memory” — the regular, practical experience needed to handle a complex rocket safely and efficiently.
This tweet is currently unavailable. It may be loading or may have been removed.
To fix this, NASA is reimagining the Artemis mission as a step-by-step test program. The agency now aims to launch about once every 10 months, standardize its rocket configurations and rebuild domestic expertise that has eroded over time.
increasing artemis launch cadence
A major change is the decision to treat Artemis III as a practice mission in Earth orbit rather than a landing attempt. That mission will let astronauts and engineers test how the Orion spacecraft and lander find each other, fly together and possibly dock. It will also allow the crews to begin checking life-support systems and other hardware inside the landers before sending them to the lunar surface. Officials said they may also conduct limited testing of the new moonwalking suit In weightlessness, if the schedule allows.
mashable light speed
NASA leaders argued that it made more sense to uncover the problems and practice operations closer to home in Earth orbit, rather than discovering them for the first time while attempting a landing on the Moon. If the fast launch pace continues, Artemis IV and Artemis V together could give NASA two opportunities in 2028. Officials stressed that the timeline still depends on hardware readiness and security reviews.
work towards doorA small space station that would orbit the moon and serve as a staging point for future missions isn’t going away, officials said. But he made it clear that the agency’s priority is to land Artemis flights more frequently before building that lunar outpost.
The reality is not far from their minds that China is also attempting to land a crew on the Moon before 2030 and may be able to get there before the United States. NASA has not sent humans to the surface of the Moon since Apollo 17 in 1972. And though no other country has made giant leaps forward for mankind, that won’t always be true.

NASA leaders announced changes to the Artemis program timeline, seeking to simplify the mission and create a phased approach from one launch to the next.
Credit: NASA Infographic
“[In] 1960s [it] “It turned out later that we had almost endless schedule margin there,” Isaacman said. Certainly not so today. I would say it’s very close from a timeline perspective.”
Artemis 2 working toward April launch
The modified mission comes as engineers work out urgent issues on the program’s first crewed flight, Artemis II. After a successful “wet dress rehearsal” – A full countdown test that loads rockets with extremely cold fuel – teams discover helium was not flowing properly For the engines in the upper stage of the rocket.
Helium is used to pressurize tanks and help deliver fuel to engines. Without proper helium flow, the rocket cannot take off safely. Because it’s hard to reach the upper stage on the launchpad, NASA wheeled the stacked rocket back to the Vehicle Assembly Building, the sky-scraping hangar where it was originally put together.
While the rocket is inside, technicians will remove and inspect suspect helium system components, update any faulty hardware, and perform other tasks. This includes replacing batteries in the flight termination system – the emergency system that could destroy the rocket if it strays off course – replacing a seal on the line that feeds liquid oxygen into the rocket, refreshing items inside Orion, and giving the closeout crew more practice sealing the capsule.
NASA wants to streamline that work to secure a chance to launch Artemis II on April 1, April 3, April 6, or April 30. They have not provided the capacity Launch dates from April onwardsDespite numerous requests from journalists to do so.

Technicians are trying to diagnose a helium flow problem in the moon rocket’s upper stage ahead of Artemis II, which could launch as early as April.
Credit: NASA
Back to the Apollo-era approach
Beyond the near term, Isaacman said NASA will standardize current Moon rocket configurations rather than evolving designs after only a few flights, as was originally planned. The goal is to avoid turning each booster into a specialized project and instead fly a simple, repeatable version that industry can achieve rapidly.
Isaacman also highlighted the restructuring of NASA’s workforce, shifting some key roles from contractors — who make up about 75 percent of the agency’s technical labor today — back to in-house expertise. NASA leaders say this will give them more control over launch preparations, as they did in the Apollo and space shuttle eras.
The White House, Congress and major contractors support the new approach, he said. The big question is whether the American public will get involved. Many people are unaware that NASA is just weeks away from sending astronauts into deep space for the first time in more than half a century.
“It’s a different environment than it was in the 1960s. There are more than three channels on a TV, so sometimes it can be challenging to get people’s attention,” Isaacman said. “I have no doubt that when Artemis II flies, the world will pay attention.”
<a href