A montage of Alex Karp, CEO of Palantir, and American flags waving over a remix of AC/DC’s Thunderstruck Blast served as the intro to the tech billionaire’s interview with Sourcery, a YouTube show presented by digital finance platform Brex. During a friendly walk through the company offices, Karp raised no questions about Palantir’s controversial relationship with ICE, but instead praised the company’s virtues, brandished a sword and discussed how he exhumed the remains of his childhood dog Rosita and reburied them near his current home.
“It’s really awesome,” host Molly O’Shea tells Karp.
If you want to hear from some of the most powerful people in tech, you’ll increasingly find them on a host of shows and podcasts like Sourcery that provide a safe space for an industry that remains wary, if not openly hostile, toward critical media outlets. Some new media outlets are created by the companies themselves. Others simply occupy a niche that has found a friendly ear among the tech billionaire class, like a remora on a fast-moving shark. The heads of tech’s biggest companies, including Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, Sam Altman, Satya Nadella and others, have sat down for long, casual interviews in recent months, while firms like Palantir and Andreessen Horowitz have stepped up this year to create their own media ventures.
At a time when most Americans distrust big tech and believe artificial intelligence will harm society, Silicon Valley has created its own network of alternative media where CEOs, founders and investors are undisputed and beloved stars. What was once the province of a few sycophantic podcasters has grown into a full-blown ecosystem of publications and shows backed by some of the most powerful people in the tech industry.
While pro-tech influencers like podcast host Lex Friedman have built a symbiotic relationship with tech elites like Elon Musk over the years, some companies have decided to cut out the middleman altogether this year. In September, venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz announced that it had launched an a16z blog on Substack. One of its lead authors, investor Katherine Boyle, has a long-standing friendship with J.D. Vance. Its podcast, meanwhile, has more than 220,000 subscribers on YouTube and last month it hosted Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, which counts Andreessen Horowitz as a major investor.
“What if the future of media is not controlled by algorithms or legacy institutions, but by independent voices building directly with their audiences?” the firm wrote in its Substack announcement. The firm once invested $50 million in digital media upstart BuzzFeed with a similar approach, but saw it fall into penny stock territory.
A16z Substack also announced this month that the company is launching an eight-week New Media Fellowship for “operators, creators, and storytellers who are shaping the future of media.” The fellowship involves collaborating with a16z’s new media operation, which it describes as being made up of “online legends”, creating a “single space where founders gain the legitimacy, taste, brand building, expertise and momentum they need to win the online narrative war”.
In addition to a16z’s media effort, Palantir launched a digital and print publication earlier this year called Republic, which mimics academic journals and thinktank-style magazines like Foreign Affairs. The journal is funded by the Palantir Foundation for Defense Policy and International Affairs, a nonprofit where Karp is president, though he works only 0.01 hours per week, according to a 2023 tax filing.
“There are a lot of people who shouldn’t have a platform. And there are a lot of people who should have a platform but don’t,” says Republic, which has an editorial team made up of senior Palantir executives.
A sample of articles published by Republic includes an essay arguing that US copyright law restrictions will prevent US AI dominance and another from two Palantir employees on how Silicon Valley working with the military is good for society, a point Karp himself has said several times.
Republic joins a growing group of pro-tech publications like Arena magazine, which was founded late last year by Austin-based venture capitalist Max Mayer. The outlet’s motto, “The New Needs Friends”, is taken from the Disney film Ratatouille.
“At Arena, we don’t cover ‘news.'” We cover The New,” said a letter from the editors in its inaugural issue. “Our mission at Arena is to celebrate those who are slowly but surely—and sometimes very quickly!—bringing the future into the present.”
The letter echoes a sentiment shared by its founder, who has criticized publications like Wired and TechCrunch for being overly critical in their coverage of the industry.
“The magazines that have historically covered this area are now super negative. By being bold and positive, we’re going to war with them,” Mayer said on Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale’s podcast.
Some parts of tech’s new media landscape have also evolved more organically rather than being created as an official corporate media arm – even if the optimistic overall tone remains the same. The TBPN video podcast, which reimagines tech industry minutiae like recruiting as a high-stakes drama similar to the NFL Draft, has grown rapidly since its launch late last year. The show’s self-aware but pro-tech vibe has attracted prominent fans and guests, including Meta’s CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, who gave a personal interview in September to promote Meta’s smart glasses.
After newsletter promotion
Another podcaster, 24-year-old Dwarkesh Patel, has built a mini media empire in recent years through long, collegial interviews with tech leaders and researchers about artificial intelligence. Earlier this month, Patel spoke with Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, who took him on a tour of one of the company’s newest datacenters.
Like many developments in technology, Elon Musk was an early adopter of this style of pro-tech media presence. After the billionaire bought Twitter in 2022, the company has shut down links to critical news outlets and installed autoreplies that return poop emojis when reporters reach out for comment. He has rarely given interviews to established media outlets, but has long sat down with sympathetic hosts like Lex Friedman and Joe Rogan, in which his opinions go largely unquestioned.
Musk’s embrace of creating a media bubble around himself has also shown how disconnected this type of content can be from reality and result in the search for alternative facts. The billionaire’s long-standing dissatisfaction with Wikipedia led him this year to create the AI knockoff Grookeypedia, which produces blatant lies and results that are more in line with his own far-right worldview. Musk’s chatbot Grok, meanwhile, has repeatedly expressed opinions that mirror the billionaire’s own opinions or go to ridiculous lengths to flatter him, including claiming last week that he is fitter than LeBron James and could beat Mike Tyson in a boxing match.
The rise of technological new media is also part of a larger change in how public figures are presenting themselves and the level of access they want to give journalists. The tech industry has a long history of being sensitive to the media and closely monitoring their operations, a trend that has accelerated following scandals such as the Facebook files, which exposed internal documents and potential harm. In an example of how cavalier some people in tech have become with negative press, journalist Karen Hao wrote in her 2025 book, Empire of AI, that OpenAI did not speak to her officially for three years after a critical profile on the company in 2019.
Tech’s move toward sympathetic outlets and in-house media creation also reflects a strategy adopted years ago by the entertainment industry. Film and album release press tours have long been strictly controlled affairs, where actors and musicians undergo easily scrutinized, low-risk interviews on shows like Hot Ones. Politicians have adopted a similar model – as evidenced by the visits of podcasters like Theo Vaughn during Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign, or California Governor, Gavin Newsom, who launched his own politics podcast earlier this year – which gives them access to new audiences and a safe space for self-promotion.
Even though much of this new media is not aimed at exposing wrongdoing or challenging those in power, it still has value. The content the tech industry is creating is often a reflection of how its elites see themselves and the world they want to create – with less government regulation and less scrutiny over how their companies are run. Even the most mundane questions can linger in the minds of people who live primarily in guarded board rooms and gated complexes.
“If you were a cupcake, which cupcake would it be?” O’Shea asked Carp about the sourcery presented by Brax.
“I don’t want to be a cupcake because I don’t want to be eaten,” Karp said. “I’m opposed to being a cupcake.”
<a href